[aspectj-users] Re: Why need AspectJ all libraries of my .jar I want to

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[aspectj-users] Re: Why need AspectJ all libraries of my .jar I want to instrument

From: Matthew Webster <matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:41:40 +0000
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/aspectj-users/>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sensitivity:



I have had a similar problem when trying to weave Apache AXIS which
contains several different JSSE factories (Sun, IBM, ...) some of which I
don't have. The simplest approach when binary weaving is to either use a
"within(my-packages)" pointcut or "!within(unused-packages)". This way the
weaver will only touch the classes that can be fully resolved.

Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester,  SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal)
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/

Prev by Date: [aspectj-users] Qn Regarding AspectJ - hanlder() call()
Next by Date: [aspectj-users] Re: Encapsulating domain specific code
Previous by thread: [aspectj-users] advanced(?) percflow uses
Next by thread: [aspectj-users] Re: Encapsulating domain specific code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs