[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [aspectj-users] AJDT 1.1.4 now available
|
The compiler accepts relative paths both from the console and from AJDT.
You're seeing a message that results from a limitation of the graphical
".lst" file designer. Whenever you view an ".lst" file in the designer it
likes to convert your graphical selection to project-relative paths before
saving the file.
So, if you need to use paths in a way that doesn't make the ".lst" designer
happy the workaround is to open the files with Eclipse's text editor
instead. AJDT shouldn't have any trouble compiling ".lst" files that work
with the command line compiler assuming that the paths are correct. Also,
please submit an enhancement bug report with your use case for the relative
paths in order to help us improve the ".lst" designer.
Let me know if that didn't address your problem.
Mik
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-users-
> admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jan VAN BESIEN
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:04 AM
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] AJDT 1.1.4 now available
>
> Andrew Clement wrote:
> > This version fully supports AspectJ 1.1.1 and also includes
> > numerous new features to make it easier for users to work with
> > AspectJ - see the 'New and Noteworthy' link from homepage.
>
> Could there be a problem with relative paths in .lst files? I use eclipse
> with AJDT 1.1.4 and I receive errors on .lst files like this one:
>
> Main.java
> Printer.java
> PrinterSubclass.java
> SingletonInstance.java
> ../../../ca/ubc/cs/spl/pattern/library/SingletonProtocol.java
>
> If I run the ajc compiler manualy (in a console window), there are no
> problems:
>
> ajc @files.lst
>
> But if I open the samen files.lst file in Eclipse, It says
>
> Use relative paths only, ommitting /the/full/path/to/ca/ubc/cs/spl/...
>
> for the last line in the files.lst file. This is weird, because it really
> is a relative path, but for some obscure reason eclipse thinks it's not.
>
> thanks in advance,
> Jan Van Besien
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
