[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [aspectj-users] execution pointcut syntax questions
|
Never mind, I've figured out what I'm doing wrong...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SADER, KEITH D (Contractor)
> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 4:15 PM
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aspectj-users] execution pointcut syntax questions
>
>
> I'm trying to declare a joinpoint on execution, but I fail to
> have my aspect executed when I give a specific package or
> specific class.
>
> Example - I have a class com.foo.bar.baz.bash.AspectedClass
> derived from com.foo.Parent
>
>
> pointcut myCalls() : execution(* *.*(..));
> // This works and my advice gets executed.
>
> pointcut myCalls() : execution(* com.foo.bar.baz..*.*(..));
> // This also works and my advice gets executed.
>
> pointcut myCalls() : execution(* com.foo.bar.baz.bash.*.*(..));
> // I expect all classes in com.foo.bar.baz.bash to be
> advised(terminology?), but it seems as if none of them are.
> // Especially the AspectedClass which is the one I'm really
> going after.
>
> pointcut myCalls() : execution(*
> com.foo.bar.baz.bash.AspectedClass.*(..));
> // I expect that AspectedClass will be advised, but it is not.
>
> pointcut myCalls() : execution(* com.foo.Parent+.*(..));
> // This pointcut doesn't seem to advise correctly either.
>
> Is there something about execution joinpoint syntax that I'm
> missing? I've RTFM and I don't see where my joinpoint syntax
> is lacking.
>
> thanks,
> ---
> Keith Sader
> Nash Resources Group sub-contracting for Computer Sciences Corporation
> IAD:TFAS
> Email:keith.d.sader@xxxxxxxx
> We've got a blind date with destiny, and it looks like she
> ordered the lobster.
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
