Re: [aspectj-dev] New intertype syntax ...new meaning?

[Andrew Eisenberg <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This does mean that today any java projects consuming the
>> type may well see ajc$blahblah as a horrid code completion suggestion
>> if working with instances of that type - so in some respects, changing
>> it to properly private is a good thing to do anyway...)
>
> Small point here... AJDT filters out all of these kinds of proposals,
> so you you should never see them.
>
Let me rephrase that slightly...it is possible to see them if you are
consuming an aspect from another project in a non-AJ project.