[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-dev] Releases source code
|
Andy Clement wrote:
> HEAD is always clean, code is only committed when all 3600 tests pass.
> Failing tests for existing bugs are commented out if committed.
> Actually, HEAD is better than AspectJ1.5.4 - so you might be better on
> the very latest - HEAD passes everything that 1.5.4 did plus all the
> new tests added since then.
Interesting. But how do I differ between getting 1.6.x and 1.5.4? Is
that where the tags come in? What would be the best way to get the
most stable 1.5.4 source?
> On 06/03/2008, Martin Görg <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Haha, alright. I need something more stable to develop a tool for.
>> Another thing kind of fitting into this topic: The test should
>> normally all run fine, right? Or are the tests for open bugs also in
>> the repository and thus bound to fail?
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Martin Görg" <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2008 1:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Releases source code
>>
>> I guess so - I've never gone back to check out a tagged version, we
>> only move forward ;)
>>
>> On 06/03/2008, Martin Goerg <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > You say, they are not in branches, but file tags. Does that conform
>> > to the 'versions' I can see when checking out with Eclipse CVS? For
>> > example, I'm just now checking out the aspectj source. To get the
>> > latest stable release, I selected version 1_5_4 from the repository.
>> > Was that correct?
>> >
>> > Thanks and Cheers
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Andy Clement" <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > To: "Martin Görg" <nimoth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Sent: Friday, March 7, 2008 12:22 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [aspectj-dev] Releases source code
>> >
>> > I presume you have looked at the FAQ to get the CVS information.
>> >
>> > How do I get and compile the source code for AspectJ?
>> > http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/faq.php#q:buildingsource
>> >
>> > The tags are reasonably clear: V1_5_0 V1_6_0 etc. These are not in
>> > branches, they are file tags.
>> >
>> > Andy.
>> >
>> > On 06/03/2008, Marco D'Ambros <marco.dambros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > Dear list,
>> > >
>> > > I am Marco D'Ambros, a Phd student in the university of Lugano
>> > > Switzerland. I am working on techniques for bug prediction and I would
>> > > like to use AspectJ as a case study.
>> > > For that, I need the source code of the various releases of AspectJ,
>> > > but I was not able to find them on the website, or to find which
>> > > sticky tag I have to use to get them from the cvs repository.
>> > > Where can I find these pieces of information?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks a lot!
>> > > Marco
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > aspectj-dev mailing list
>> > > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > aspectj-dev mailing list
>> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > aspectj-dev mailing list
>> > aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-dev mailing list
>> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-dev mailing list
>> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
