Re: [aspectj-dev] Aspects class and Generics

[Adrian Colyer <adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, we should give this generic signatures - unless you encountered
some reason why we couldn't do this during the implementation Alex??

On 09/11/05, Eduardo Rocha <eduardorochabr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In The AspectJTM 5 Development Kit Developer's Notebook
> (http://eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/index.html),
> Chapter 9 (http://eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/ataspectj-aspectof.html),
> it says that Aspects class has strongly typed methods, but actually it
> doesn't. Any plans of making, for example, "aspectOf" use generics as
> in the document?
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>


--
-- Adrian
adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx