Re: [aspectj-dev] Aspects class and Generics

[Matthew Webster <matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Adrian,

This implies the API is _only_ to be
used for @AspectJ because a generic interface would break on JDK 1.4. This
change would prevent users of the AspectJ syntax from using the Aspects
interface for whatever reason (this has happened). Is this OK?

Matthew Webster
AOSD Project
Java Technology Centre, MP146
IBM Hursley Park, Winchester,  SO21 2JN, England
Telephone: +44 196 2816139 (external) 246139 (internal) 
Email: Matthew Webster/UK/IBM @ IBMGB, matthew_webster@xxxxxxxxxx
http://w3.hursley.ibm.com/~websterm/

Please respond to AspectJ developer discussions <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Sent by:        aspectj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

To:        AspectJ developer discussions <aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:        
Subject:        Re: [aspectj-dev] Aspects class and Generics


Yes, we should give this generic signatures - unless you encountered
some reason why we couldn't do this during the implementation Alex??

On 09/11/05, Eduardo Rocha <eduardorochabr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In The AspectJTM 5 Development Kit Developer's Notebook
> (http://eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/index.html),
> Chapter 9 (http://eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/ataspectj-aspectof.html),
> it says that Aspects class has strongly typed methods, but actually it
> doesn't. Any plans of making, for example, "aspectOf" use generics as
> in the document?
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev
>


--
-- Adrian
adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
aspectj-dev mailing list
aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev