Re: [aspectj-dev] Stateful JoinPoints

[Wes Isberg <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi David -

The way to make your request compelling would be to write two 
programs, one using inheritance as you proposed and one using the 
join point signature as a key to a Map, describe the limitations 
each would impose on an implementation, and show that the first 
is much better than the second.  You might also consider whether 
it's StaticPart or {Code}Signature that you want to subtype.

Thanks -
Wes

David J. Pearce wrote:
> Eric Eide wrote:
>
> > "Eric" == Eric Eide <eeide@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >     Eric> Does AspectJ actually guarantee anything about the identity of
> >     Eric> the static part object?  (I don't know.)  [...]
> >
> > Modulo AspectJ's guarantees about the handling of static part objects, 
> > maybe
> > you could accomplish your goal (adding fields to static part 
> > instances) by
> > writing aspects over the AspectJ runtime.
>
>
> Hmmmm. intersting idea ... could this really work ???
>
> Dave
>
> > Note that I haven't actually tried this --- but isn't this the just 
> > the kind of
> > thing that AspectJ is supposed to help you with :-)?
> >
> > Eric.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-dev mailing list
> aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev