[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [aspectj-dev] Aspectj bug
|
Thanks ...!!
But if i use execution instead of call this work
propertly.
Jim appended the following to the
bug report last Thursday: > This
is a common confusion. To get your desired behavior, use: > call(public void bar()) &&
target(FooImpl) >
> For more
info, see this bug report where we've added a warning for program's
> like yours to the forthcoming
AspectJ-1.2: >
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 Regards, Adrian. -- Adrian
Adrian_Colyer@xxxxxxxxxx
| "Matias Castellani"
<mcastellani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
23/02/2004 16:42 Please respond to aspectj-dev
| To:
<aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> cc:
Subject: [aspectj-dev] Aspectj
bug |
Hi all,
Any one
have some imformation about this
bug?
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=51925
--
MatÃas A.
Castellani
mailto:mcastellani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Datatransfer
S.A.
4382-6400 int
123
_______________________________________________
aspectj-dev mailing
list
aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-dev