[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [aspectj-dev] AJDE 1.1 status
- From: "Mik Kersten" <beatmik@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:32:33 -0700
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Thread-index: AcMrfvoybrId8IXfTuqmX22UvIkQ4wAB6Vog
We just discussed this during the AJDT meeting and agreed with you in
avoiding a delay of the 1.1 release. AJDT is not affected as much by the
problems I described. So we'll list them known-issues with AJDT, and will
focus on getting the remaining high-priority AJDT bugs fixed in time for a
release next week.
The JBuilder and NetBeans plugins should wait for an updated 1.1 release.
The changes they require should be localized to AJDE and will not be
destabilizing to the compiler.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aspectj-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jim.Hugunin@xxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:24 AM
> To: aspectj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Mik Kersten wrote:
> > I want us to figure out if it is worth delaying the 1.1 release by 2
> > in order to give me time to fix the remaining high priority issues
> > below. Help from others could shorten that time. If we don't delay I,
> > *sigh*, think that we should postpone the Eclipse, JBuilder, and
> > plugin releases until 1.1.1 comes out.
> It's too late in the game to delay the release two weeks for a large set
> of missing features/bugs that could have been detected months ago. We
> should release AspectJ-1.1.0 either today or tomorrow (preferably today).
> I'm happy to release any build that both George and Wes can agree has been
> properly built and tested. Personally, I think the build that George
> produced and tested manually would be quite reasonable.
> The current plugin support will be very useful to people even with the
> issues you list and it would be nice to see a release to go along with
> 1.1.0. However, that decision rests in the hands of the different plugin
> development groups.
> PS - If any committers disagree with this decision on the release, you are
> entitled to call for a vote on postponing the release in order to include
> Mik's changes.
> aspectj-dev mailing list