Re: [aperi-dev] Problems and doubts about Aperi SRM and San Simulator

["Amudhan Gunasekaran" <amudhan.gg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ramani,

In that case CIMOM discovery is not yet supported by Aperi SRM, is there any other way or protocol by which a switch could be discovered\probed by Aperi SRM?

Thanks and Regards,
Amudhan.

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Ramani R Routray <routrayr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Amudhan,

>I simulated a brocade switch through SAN Simulator and tried to discover
that in Aperi SRM. But I could not find any switch in the topology. Also, I
could not figure out how to solve this issue. I could add the >CIMOM of the
switch but even after CIMOM discovery is successfully completed, the switch
is not really discovered. Is it a known issue? Or am I missing something?
What should I do to discover a simulated >(configuration based) switch?

You can not discover/probe fabric CIMOM from Aperi SRM. This feature is not
available in the current release of Aperi SRM.

Regarding the Aperi Sc

regards,
Ramani R. Routray
IBM Almaden Research Center

            "Amudhan
            Gunasekaran"
            <amudhan.gg@gmail                                          To
            .com>                     "Aperi Development"
            Sent by:                  <aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
            aperi-dev-bounces                                          cc
            @eclipse.org
                                                                  Subject
                                      Re: [aperi-dev] Problems and doubts

            05/06/2008 12:20          about Aperi SRM and San Simulator
            PM

            Please respond to
            Aperi Development
            <aperi-dev@eclips
                 e.org>

Hi Ramani,

Also, I think the documentation about the schema of the database is not in
sync with actual schema. Have any changes been made in the schema? If so,
where can I find the latest schema? I saw the actual table
T_RES_STORAGE_VOLUME and other tables in the Derby database, but they were
not having the exact columns mentioned in the document, some of the
mentioned columns were not present. Please clarify my doubts.

Also, thanks to Pallavi for clarifying my doubts, I am now clear about the
two questions I asked.

Thanks and Regards,
Amudhan.



On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Robert Wipfel <rawipfel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 >>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:26 PM, in message
 <OF3559B806.9FE56F55-ON8825743B.0017C288-8825743B.001864D6@xxxxxxxxxx>,
 Ramani
 R Routray <routrayr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > Hi Amudhan,
 >
 > Thats great. Aperi SRM supports discovery of  CIM/SMI- S compliant
 storage
 > subsystems. But, pls. check, if Aperi SRM is enabled for CIM/SMI- S
 > discovery of FC Switches.
 > I think current Aperi SRM supports discovery of FC switch through
 Brocade
 > API and not through CIM/SMI- S.

 Via the Fibre Channel MIB?

 Robert

 _______________________________________________
 aperi-dev mailing list
 aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev



--

http://amudhans.blogspot.com.

_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev


_______________________________________________
aperi-dev mailing list
aperi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aperi-dev

-- 
http://amudhans.blogspot.com