Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [ajdt-dev] CVS HEAD & Eclipse 3.3

Ok that's great news! Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Matt Chapman
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 8:03 AM
To: AspectJ Development Tools developer discussions
Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] CVS HEAD & Eclipse 3.3

Yes, there will continue to be development builds for Eclipse 3.2 also
- sorry if I wasn't clear about that.

On 10/08/06, Ron Bodkin <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Could I convince you to keep offering development builds for Eclipse 3.2
> also, so we can get updates and improvements more often?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On
> Behalf Of Matt Chapman
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:55 AM
> To: AspectJ Development Tools developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] CVS HEAD & Eclipse 3.3
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> It's too early to say how much changes in eclipse 3.3 will help AJDT -
> we will certainly continue to push on various issues, such as better
> PDE integration for generating build files. But most issues can
> probably be addressed from within AspectJ + AJDT, including the ones
> you mention. There will be a 1.4.1 release for 3.2 around the time of
> AspectJ 1.5.3, and this will contain all those AJDT changes which
> don't explicitly require 3.3. Our multi-branch release streams allow
> us to churn out AJDT releases for each Eclipse version for as long as
> there is demand for them.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt.
>
> On 10/08/06, Ron Bodkin <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I'm curious whether there's anything slated for 3.3 that will help AJDT?
> I'd
> > sure like to see continued enhancements for 3.2, most notably avoiding
> > continuous recompiles(*) and allowing better incremental compilation
> > (especially when there are errors: I truly dread syntax errors when
> working
> > with multiple projects). Will ajdt1_4 continue to get these and other
> > usability enhancements? I'd sure like to continue getting dev builds for
> > 3.2. I suspect that very few users are working on 3.3 milestone builds
> yet.
> >
> > (*) I still need to try to simplify my environment so you can recreate
> this
> > problem. I am waiting for an AspectJ bug fix to make its way into a dev
> > build of AJDT so I can reproduce with a recent dev build.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ajdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> > Behalf Of Matt Chapman
> > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:08 AM
> > To: AspectJ Development Tools developer discussions
> > Subject: [ajdt-dev] CVS HEAD & Eclipse 3.3
> >
> > The AJDT source code in CVS HEAD is now for Eclipse 3.3 builds only -
> > it will be kept updated to work only with recent integration and
> > milestone builds. If you want to work with a more stable source code
> > environment, stick with Eclipse 3.2 and the ajdt1_4 branch.
> >
> > This is so we can support the upcoming 3.3M1 build with development
> > builds in the AJDT 1.5 stream.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Matt.
> > _______________________________________________
> > ajdt-dev mailing list
> > ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ajdt-dev mailing list
> > ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
ajdt-dev mailing list
ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev



Back to the top