Re: [ajdt-dev] strange problem using AJDT with Eclipse 3.0 m4

[Martin Lippert <lippert@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Mik,

> It is unlikely for that to be the source of the problem, since the AspectJ
> plugin ships with JDT 2.1 classes that it depends on, does not expose them,
> and should not use the JDT classes of the Eclipse version that it is running
> in.  This assumes that plugin classloading hasn't changed, which I hope is a
> safe assumption.
>
> Martin, could you please create a minimal test case and submit it as a bug
> marked "critical"?

Done. Take a look at

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45088

Thanks for taking a look at it.

Best regards,
Martin



> Mik
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ajdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ajdt-dev-
> > admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rbodkin
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 4:13 PM
> > To: ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [ajdt-dev] strange problem using AJDT with Eclipse 3.0 m4
> >
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > I found that using incremental compilation in Eclipse 3.0 m3 broke badly
> > for
> > me (and submitted a bug report).
> >
> > I believe the problem is that the AspectJ compiler reuses some of the JDT
> > compiler classes and it has to use internal interfaces; so a major shift
> > like
> > from 2.1 to 3.0 requires work on the compiler core. There was a need to
> > work
> > on this in the move from 2.0 to 2.1.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:11:03 +0200, Martin Lippert wrote
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a very strange problem using AJDT 1.1.4 with Eclipse 3.0 m4.
> > > I compiled an aspect that contains something like:
> > >
> > > thisJoinPoint.getSignature();
> > >
> > > The compiler output for this (using the -noweave option) is wrong.
> > > The bytecode for the compiled aspect contains a call to the class
> > > org.aspectj.lang.JoinPoint.getSignature (instead of
> > > JoinPoint$StaticPart.getSignature which would be right).
> > >
> > > Now the strange thing: If I compile the same aspect using AJDT 1.1.4
> > > within Eclipse 2.1.1 the bytecode of the compiled aspect is correct.
> > >
> > > Any idea on that??????
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > Ron Bodkin
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > New Aspects
> > m: (415) 509-2895
> > _______________________________________________
> > ajdt-dev mailing list
> > ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajdt-dev mailing list
> ajdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ajdt-dev

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature