Bug 99521 - Add join point(s) for critical code sections (synchronized on an object)
Summary: Add join point(s) for critical code sections (synchronized on an object)
Status: REOPENED
Alias: None
Product: AspectJ
Classification: Tools
Component: Compiler (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P5 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Adrian Colyer CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-11 18:59 EDT by Missing name CLA
Modified: 2009-08-30 02:50 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Missing name CLA 2005-06-11 18:59:26 EDT 
It would be most useful to be able to specify certain additional join points; 
specifically so that you could have pointcuts just before an object is locked, 
just after it is locked, just before it is to be released, and just after it 
is released.
Comment 1 Adrian Colyer CLA 2005-08-26 11:28:00 EDT 
We're not going to get to this in AJ 1.5.0. Marking as "LATER" for consideration
in 1.5.1 and future release planning.
Comment 2 Missing name CLA 2005-08-27 00:54:48 EDT 
And there's no better way to indicate that status than to mark it 'fixed??!'

{sigh}  Thank you for the response...
Comment 3 Adrian Colyer CLA 2005-08-27 02:17:13 EDT 
oops, it's not supposed to be marked "FIXED", it should be marked "LATER" as per my previous comment. 
I'm re-opening to assign the correct status.
Comment 4 Adrian Colyer CLA 2005-08-27 02:20:48 EDT 
Now assigning the "LATER" status as I originally intended. You were quite correct, if we mark something 
"FIXED" we don't revisit it, whereas "LATER" bugs form candidates for next release items.

Thanks for the spot.
Comment 5 Gilles Scokart CLA 2008-05-14 10:00:05 EDT 
This request seems to be a duplicate of of the bug # 123759
Comment 6 Missing name CLA 2008-05-14 21:03:56 EDT 
Indeed these two requests do appear to be the same, though to be accurate, bug # 123759 would be a duplicate of this one.  There is certainly a nicely detailed discussion going on in the comments of bug # 123759.
Comment 7 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2009-08-30 02:50:12 EDT 
LATER/REMIND bugs are being automatically reopened as P5 because the LATER and REMIND resolutions are deprecated.