Community
Participate
Working Groups
boolean test; test= (the proposal should be true/false) I don't think the request of the status 'test' makes much sense, i.e. if (test == true) { .... => the first part would be very nice to have it.
What exactly are you asking for ?
what is unclear from the first two lines of the code?
What about any other boolean expressions ?
That's an idea, but somehow you have to set the boolean to true or false. And I would say it's #1 task you'll do in a code. I know, there are other possibilities of setting it, but focusing on the most use-cases I would say true/false. It's still a proposal, nothing more. BTW: Since I've developed VB as well, that VB6-IDE has this proposal as default and I found it most useful! Simple, easy, effective.
Ok, so your original request was actually: true/false should be included on boolean completions (and I agree with best relevance). I was talking about: boolean test = somePredicate(); I wonder how we missed the obvious true/false case
To say it that way: #1 priority is this true/false. I wonder as well why this obvious issue nobody thought about ;) the other assignments is an idea, but I guess too much about it. cause you could easily extend it to non-boolean like integer and then it get's complicated. Except somebody has an clear idea about what could be.
Fixed and test added CompletionTests#testCompletionKeywordTrue5() CompletionTests#testCompletionKeywordTrue6() true or false were already proposed but relevance computation was not complete. They are not only keywords, they are also boolean expressions.
Verified in I20050510-0010 + JDT/Core v_556
