Community
Participate
Working Groups
I use Eclipse with OptimizeIt for profiling. I am continually creating launch configurations to pass the right command-line arguments, environment variables, etc. to optimize it. ENHANCEMENT 1: Allow launch configurations to be exported. - Provide some way to export a launch configuration in a form which could be imported into another workspace. - Make the export format easy to create, such that 3rd-party vendors (such as OptimizeIt) could ship their product with an importable launch configuration that picks up all the right libraries, and all I need to do is select the name of my app and its arguments. ENHANCEMENT 2: Rather than including all options in the launch config, separate the concerns. Right now, each launch configuration directly contains all options I need to launch my app, but I may want to reuse different subsets of options. For example, whenever I launch an SWT app I need to provide a certain DLL, whenever I launch with OptimizeIt I need to include certain VM arguments and additional environment variables, etc... and whenever I'm launching a certain app, I need to include certain dependencies on the classpath. It would be nice if these different concerns could be configured independently. This is, if there was a way for me to describe the following rules (in a form which could be reused and exported): - SWT apps are a type of java application. Here's how to launch an SWT app on a local VM. - java apps can be launched with OptimizeIt. Here's a template that describes how to launch a java app on a local VM. - Program A is an SWT application with the following dependencies. Configuring these things independently could greatly simplify the launch configuration dialog. A launch configuration for a Java Application would only need to contain 1 page with 4 fields: - Which application to execute - What program arguments to pass in - What working directory to use - Which "device" to run on (I'm using the term "device" to indicate where the program will be launched. A particular VM running on the local machine might be one kind of device that can run Java Applications and Eclipse Applications from the local machine, but it should also be possible for 3rd party plugins to supply devices that run midlets on a cellphone or emulator, java applications on a remote machine, etc.) The remaining launch configuration options (classpath, VM args, source directory, JRE, plugins, etc.) would be a function of which application I'm launching and what device I'm launching it on. For example, I could supply my OptimizeIt options by declaring OptimizeIt as a device that passes additional arguments to a local VM. I could then use OptimizeIt to launch any Java Application or Eclipse Application by telling it to run on the OptimizeIt device. If I'm launching an SWT app, I would simply declare that my application requires SWT and allow the device to resolve the dependency. I (the user) would have configured the local VM to resolve the SWT dependency by adding a particular DLL to the command-line. A remote device (cellphone, etc.) would either take the appropriate steps to resolve the requirement for SWT or report back that it is incapable of launching SWT apps. Similarly, downstream products that support alternative JCLs could declare the JCL as a type of dependency. Including this device abstraction would simplify the launching UI in Eclipse (In most cases, the user would never need to see the classpath, environment, or JRE tabs), and would greatly simply the UI for downstream products (like WSDD) that support embedded development. I guess this is just a rambling wishlist for new launching features. Hopefully someone finds some part of this inspiring. :-)
Deferred. Thanks for the input. Part of this is similar to the request to allow for launching templates (see bug 41353). We will consider launching improvements in later releases.
marking as dup.
import/export = bug 12898 templates = bug 41353 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41353 ***
bug 41353 doesn't really cover what I'm looking for. Even with templates, managing a M programs that launch in E environments and typically take I different inputs would either require M*E*I different launch configurations or would require constantly changing the configuration. The point of this bug is to let me select the three dimensions of a launch independently.