Community
Participate
Working Groups
Another usability proposal... Nicholas Lesiecki suggested (in the email "Changing this, doc clarification[...]") a special form of "proceed()" which uses the arguments passed in to the join point, in the interest of making explicit the intention to not replace any values or references (even though Java doesn't support "const".) To distinguish this form from a mistake (and show how special it really is), it should probably be "proceed(..);" (if that's amenable to the parser).
interesting idea... scheduling for proper consideration in aj5m4
We're not going to get to this in AJ 1.5.0. Marking as "LATER" for consideration in 1.5.1 and future release planning.
LATER/REMIND bugs are being automatically reopened as P5 because the LATER and REMIND resolutions are deprecated.