Bug 83592 - [1.5][assist] TYPE_REF proposals don't always have a generic signature
Summary: [1.5][assist] TYPE_REF proposals don't always have a generic signature
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux-GTK
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: JDT-Core-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-25 04:21 EST by Tom Hofmann CLA
Modified: 2023-08-01 16:09 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tom Hofmann CLA 2005-01-25 04:21:33 EST 
I20050118

Have this code (caret at |) and invoke code assist:

-----------

interface Iterable2<A> {
}

class X2 {
  void m() {
    Iterable|  
  }
}

---------

In my CompletionRequestor, I get TYPE_REF proposals for java.lang.Iterable and
Iterable2. The latter carries a generic type signature, while the former does
not. This is not consistent.

It turns out that only types from the current CU have a generic signature, but
neither binary types nor types in different CUs.

My expectation is that I always get the generic type signature.
Comment 1 Eclipse Genie CLA 2019-06-12 13:25:24 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 2 Dani Megert CLA 2019-06-13 11:19:07 EDT 
Jay, please check whether this is still an issue.
Comment 3 Jay Arthanareeswaran CLA 2019-08-20 04:20:06 EDT 
Yes, this is still relevant. I reproduced in the latest 4.13 I build.
Comment 4 Eclipse Genie CLA 2021-08-10 16:16:23 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 5 Eclipse Genie CLA 2023-08-01 16:09:51 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.