Bug 78520 - [model] IType#getSuperInterfaceTypeSignatures() doesn't include type arguments
Summary: [model] IType#getSuperInterfaceTypeSignatures() doesn't include type arguments
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 major (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.1 M5   Edit
Assignee: Jerome Lanneluc CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-12 11:33 EST by Markus Keller CLA
Modified: 2005-02-15 06:47 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
BinaryType.diff (736 bytes, patch)
2005-01-05 13:48 EST, Tom Hofmann CLA 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Markus Keller CLA 2004-11-12 11:33:01 EST 
200411111200

Calling IType#getSuperInterfaceTypeSignatures() on the IType for binary type
'Integer' (from an 1.5 rt.jar) yields '[Ljava.lang.Comparable;]'. The type
argument from the declaration ('implements Comparable<Integer>') is missing.
Comment 1 Jerome Lanneluc CLA 2005-01-05 12:25:38 EST 
Fixed BinaryType#getSuperInterfaceSignatures() to use the generic signature if
present.
Added regression test ClassFileTests#testGetSuperInterfaceSignatures()
Comment 2 Tom Hofmann CLA 2005-01-05 13:48:42 EST 
Created attachment 16949 [details]
BinaryType.diff

Now the the signatures returned use '/' as package fragment separator - the
returned names should be filtered through ClassFile.translatedName as well, see
the enclosed patch.
Comment 3 Jerome Lanneluc CLA 2005-01-05 13:59:16 EST 
You're right. Thanks for the fix Tom. It is now released and the test updated.
Comment 4 David Audel CLA 2005-02-15 06:47:02 EST 
Verified in I20050214-0927