Description Keven Ring 2004-10-15 13:23:09 EDT

Non-public classes, when explicitly named, do not get woven.

The test case below exhibits this problem when the package declaration is
uncommented.

If the package declaration is commented out, the class is woven correctly.
If the package declaration is uncommented, a compilation failure occurs with
AspectJ 1.2.  According to Andrew Clement, AspectJ 1.2.1 compiles, but does not
weave.
If the "MyInnerClass" is changed to be public [regardless of the package
declaration status], the class is woven correctly.

Also:
When the "MyInnerClass" is moved out of "MyClass", but kept in the MyClass.java
file, then the following behavior is exhibited:
If the package declaration is commented out, the class is woven correctly.
If the package declaration is uncommented out, a compilation failure occurs with
AspectJ 1.2.
Note, in this case, MyInnerClass cannot be declared as public.

It also appears that if the RunnableAspect is placed in the same package as
"MyClass", weaving occurs correctly, regardless of any class access modifiers

<MyClass.java>

// package mypackage;

public class MyClass {
 public MyClass() {
   MyInnerClass mic = new MyInnerClass();
   if (mic instanceof Runnable)
     mic.run();
 }

 class MyInnerClass {
   public void run() {
     System.out.println("In MyInnerClass.run()!!");
   }
 }

 public static void main(String args[]) {
   new MyClass();
 }
}

</MyClass.java>

<RunnableAspect.aj>

public aspect RunnableAspect {
 declare parents: MyClass$MyInnerClass implements Runnable;
 // declare parents: mypackage.MyClass$MyInnerClass implements Runnable;
}

</RunnableAspect.aj>