Bug 71516 - Code in ajde-src.zip doesn't match compiled code in CVS
Summary: Code in ajde-src.zip doesn't match compiled code in CVS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: AspectJ
Classification: Tools
Component: Compiler (show other bugs)
Version: DEVELOPMENT   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 minor (vote)
Target Milestone: 1.2.1   Edit
Assignee: Adrian Colyer CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 71518 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-05 16:51 EDT by Wesley Coelho CLA
Modified: 2004-10-21 04:32 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wesley Coelho CLA 2004-08-05 16:51:30 EDT 
When I get the latest compiled code from CVS and attach the source from ajde-
src.zip, it seems that the source code doesn't match the byte code. For 
example, IRelationship.hasRuntimeTest() exists in the source code but not in 
the byte code. It could be that the source code in ajde-src.zip needs to be 
updated to match the latest byte code in CVS.
Comment 1 Andrew Clement CLA 2004-08-06 03:25:51 EDT 
Hi, I'm assuming you are referring to the ajde-src.zip that is part of AJDT. 
AJDT 1.1.11 was built on a branch of AspectJ.  The branch has just been merged
(yesterday) back into the AspectJ CVS codebase.  This means AJDT 1.1.12 (due
next week) will be based on the CVS version of AspectJ and ajde-src.zip shipped
with AJDT 1.1.12 will match AspectJ CVS.  ajde-src.zip is built automatically
when packaging org.aspectj.ajde so it should always be in step from now on. 
please feel free to reopen the bug if it isnt :)
Comment 2 Andrew Clement CLA 2004-08-06 03:26:28 EDT 
*** Bug 71518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Mik Kersten CLA 2004-08-08 11:04:28 EDT 
I worked around this with Wes by setting up a workspace that contains both the 
AspectJ modules, the AJDT plugins, and creates the ajde.jar file accordingly.  
So he's not stuck waiting on the release.
Comment 4 Adrian Colyer CLA 2004-10-21 04:32:29 EDT 
Fix released as part of AspectJ 1.2.1