Bug 71513 - [Help Wanted][Managed Build] Make Targets empty for Managed Make
Summary: [Help Wanted][Managed Build] Make Targets empty for Managed Make
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: CDT
Classification: Tools
Component: cdt-build-managed (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact: Jonah Graham CLA
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: helpwanted
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-05 16:48 EDT by Ed Willink CLA
Modified: 2020-09-04 15:24 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ed Willink CLA 2004-08-05 16:48:10 EDT
The Make Targets view is empty for a managed C make
 - no clean, all, ...

Adding a makefile.targets make sno additions either.
Comment 1 Sean Evoy CLA 2004-08-16 15:15:07 EDT
Managed make projects are not currently able to contribute to the make target 
list. If there is time in 2.1, we will address the problems. However, there 
will only be two targets for a managed project (all and clean), so this will 
only be a convenience for the user, not a way to add new targets for the 
generator.
Comment 2 Ed Willink CLA 2004-08-16 15:33:07 EDT
That's disappointing, because I've been surprised at how good the managed make
is and with autogeneration of child lists, there are many make problems that
can be solved solely within the top-level makefile.defs/init.

e.g. "make backup" to copy all changed files to more persistent storage. 
Comment 3 Sean Evoy CLA 2004-08-16 15:55:25 EDT
Point taken. Let be more specific about the problem. I did try to use the make 
target view in the 2.0 release, but there are two requirements the managed 
builder has that cannot currently be met by the view. First, I need to be able 
to turn off adding/removing a target in the generated makefiles, but leave it 
on for user-supplied files. Second, I have to sort the use case of editing make 
settings via that dialog. In short, it was too much risk at the time. The next 
window for looking at this is the 2.1 release. 
Comment 4 Sean Evoy CLA 2004-11-01 11:49:59 EST
I don't know if this is a direction Leo wants to take the MBS. If so, the 
problems I had were serious and require a committment from the maintainers of 
the make target view to support the use cases I mentioned, namely the ability 
to turn off the add/remove menu item selectively and disable the edit 
functionality (or at least delegate it to the MBS so we can display the 
correct UI).
Comment 5 Doug Schaefer CLA 2007-08-21 10:54:15 EDT
Future means you commit to fix it in the Future. Inboxes can't make committments. Moving to '--'.
Comment 6 Chris Recoskie CLA 2009-05-06 15:55:06 EDT
Triaging as valid.

No one is currently planning on working on this.  Help wanted.
Comment 7 Andrew Gvozdev CLA 2009-07-08 23:51:16 EDT
Mmm, one of early patches I played with is along this line, bug 238919. Shell be revisited and reworked one day...