Bug 69056 - [1.5] incorrect javadoc in ITypeBinding.isParameterizedType
Summary: [1.5] incorrect javadoc in ITypeBinding.isParameterizedType
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.1 M2   Edit
Assignee: Frederic Fusier CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-30 14:22 EDT by Adam Kiezun CLA
Modified: 2004-09-23 12:32 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Adam Kiezun CLA 2004-06-30 14:22:11 EDT 
latest from 1_5 branch
 * For example, a AST type like 
 * <code>Collection&lt;String&gt;</code> typically resolves to a
 * parameterized type binding whose erasure is a type binding for the class 
 * <code>java.util.Collection</code> and whose type argument is a type
 * binding for the class <code>java.util.Collection</code>.

surely, the type argument was intended to be java.lang.String
Comment 1 Frederic Fusier CLA 2004-07-26 12:21:59 EDT 
Could you provide code example including your Javadoc comment.
Currently compiler javadoc parser is not able to understand 1.5 syntax. So, I'm
really suprised that you get any binding in a DOM/AST Javadoc hierarchy?!...
Comment 2 Adam Kiezun CLA 2004-07-26 12:41:06 EDT 
Frédéric, it's simply a typo. :)
I think the last line in the doc should be:
" * binding for the class <code>java.lang.String</code>"

unless you're referring to another report
Comment 3 Frederic Fusier CLA 2004-07-27 04:35:37 EDT 
Oooops. I was completely wrong here.
I'll fix the typo...
Thanks
Comment 4 Frederic Fusier CLA 2004-07-27 04:40:21 EDT 
Fixed and released in HEAD.
Comment 5 David Audel CLA 2004-09-23 12:32:45 EDT 
Verified in I200409230100.