Bug 68898 - [spell checking] More options for (not) spell checking
Summary: [spell checking] More options for (not) spell checking
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Text (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 enhancement with 2 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: JDT-Text-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 166897 183880 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-29 13:45 EDT by David Jackman CLA
Modified: 2011-05-24 02:24 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Jackman CLA 2004-06-29 13:45:01 EDT 
After playing with spell checking for a while, here are some recommendations:
1. I'd like to be able to turn off spell checking in string constants.
2. I'd like to ignore everything inside an HTML tag (currently, it hollers at me
about attribute names and closing tags).
3. It should include symbols in the check if they appear in the dictionary.  For
example, if "inc." is in the dictionary, then checking "inc." in the text
shouldn't cause a problem (currently, it mark "inc" and suggests changing it to
"inc.").
Comment 1 David Jackman CLA 2004-06-29 14:42:48 EDT 
4. I'd like to ignore everything inside <code> or <pre> tags.
Comment 2 Dani Megert CLA 2005-02-18 09:12:43 EST 
*** Bug 85747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Randy Hudson CLA 2005-02-18 10:18:08 EST 
Bug 85747 is a problem with the tokenizer.
Comment 4 Dani Megert CLA 2005-02-18 10:22:04 EST 
correct.
Comment 5 Gunnar Wagenknecht CLA 2006-10-09 03:47:29 EDT 
It should also ignore type names in JavaDoc comments.
Comment 6 Dani Megert CLA 2006-12-11 02:25:07 EST 
*** Bug 166897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Dani Megert CLA 2006-12-12 07:00:02 EST 
See also bug 167599.
Comment 8 Dani Megert CLA 2011-05-24 02:24:38 EDT 
*** Bug 183880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***