Bug 60235 - WorkingCopyOwner needs clarification on
Summary: WorkingCopyOwner needs clarification on
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.0 M9   Edit
Assignee: Philipe Mulet CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-04-28 08:23 EDT by Dirk Baeumer CLA
Modified: 2004-05-18 14:09 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dirk Baeumer CLA 2004-04-28 08:23:39 EDT 
- how do I use one and why do I have to make a sub class
- what exactly happens when a buffer is created. Is this a unique buffer ?
Comment 1 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-04-28 09:18:53 EDT 
Need to document the spec along the following line:

Clients intending to own working copies are supposed to define an explicit 
owner. Therefore the abstract class is providing functional defaults, but still 
we want the client to own its owner...

Buffer-wise, different working copies are associated with different buffers 
obtained by a request to the owner (though the owner implementation could 
actually reuse some buffers if it wanted). Working copies are considered 
different if they denote different units (think path to file) or if they are 
associated to different owners.
Comment 2 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-04-28 12:54:31 EDT 
Done (see WorkingCopyOwner doc changes).
Comment 3 Olivier Thomann CLA 2004-05-18 14:09:14 EDT 
Verified in 200405180816