Bug 58606 - Inner class in child calling protected method in parent
Summary: Inner class in child calling protected method in parent
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.0 M9   Edit
Assignee: Philipe Mulet CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-04-15 01:03 EDT by Alessandro Vernet CLA
Modified: 2004-05-18 13:57 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Test classes (605 bytes, application/zip)
2004-04-15 01:04 EDT, Alessandro Vernet CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alessandro Vernet CLA 2004-04-15 01:03:32 EDT 
Compile the 2 attached files in Eclipse, and run p2.test2 from the command line
with the -Xfuture option. You will get this exception:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
p1.test1.doit()V from class p2.test2$1
        at p2.test2$1.bar(test2.java:9)
        at p2.test2.foo(test2.java:11)
        at p2.test2.main(test2.java:17)

Eclipse does not seem to generate an accessor from p2.test2 to p1.test1, like
Sun's javac does.

Note:
I am using -Xfuture not because I want to be paranoid, but because I have this
problem when this code runs inside a Web application. The VM for the app. server
is not started with -Xfuture, so I just assume that the VM is more strict  when
the code is loaded through a class loader.
Comment 1 Alessandro Vernet CLA 2004-04-15 01:04:08 EDT 
Created attachment 9517 [details]
Test classes
Comment 2 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-04-15 07:50:27 EDT 
Which version of Eclipse are you using ? Cannot reproduce in latest 3.0.
Comment 3 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-04-15 08:08:32 EDT 
Actually, I was able to reproduce it. I had forgot to specify '-verify' on 
command line.
Comment 4 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-04-15 09:29:59 EDT 
Problem comes from the fact we did not perform emulation for static targets 
(fields or methods).

Fixed, added regression test InnerEmulationTest#test115
Comment 5 Alessandro Vernet CLA 2004-04-17 23:01:35 EDT 
Thanks for fixing this so quickly!
Comment 6 Olivier Thomann CLA 2004-05-18 13:57:11 EDT 
Verified in 200405180816