Bug 539159 - [performance] Indexer improvements for methodRef category
Summary: [performance] Indexer improvements for methodRef category
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 4.9   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: JDT-Core-Inbox CLA
QA Contact: Manoj N Palat CLA
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-09-17 10:50 EDT by Roland Grunberg CLA
Modified: 2022-09-10 09:32 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Roland Grunberg CLA 2018-09-17 10:50:02 EDT
This is a proposal as well as a discussion based on suggestions made as part of Igor's POC in https://github.com/ifedorenko/jdt-indexer-musings . Certain parts of it are probably a no-go for now (eg. rocksdb adoption) but exploring small changes to the indexer format that may yield performance benefits seems worth it.

- Add class information for the given method reference (eg. a key of toString/0 becomes toString/0/java.lang.Object ) and using class hierarchy information to also include method references of sub-classes.

I've been playing around with a relatively small patch that does this but am working through how to fetch the hierarchy information more efficiently.
Comment 1 Eclipse Genie CLA 2020-09-13 17:28:35 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 2 Eclipse Genie CLA 2022-09-10 09:32:19 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.