Community
Participate
Working Groups
Reading http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/154 suggest classes lacks of serialization ID seems confusing and misleading It is a nice idea, broken in several ways: - IDE do not warn if other classes use same ID as others (copy/paste do exists, sadly) - IDE do not warn if you modify a class so ID is invalid
What exactly are you requesting us to do?
This come after a twitter discussion https://twitter.com/albfanjul/status/1000865733595844608?s=19 I think remove that validation is a good idea But is ok for me not accept this issue, just want to move discussion to a more formal workflow
(In reply to Alberto Alonso from comment #2) > This come after a twitter discussion > > https://twitter.com/albfanjul/status/1000865733595844608?s=19 > > I think remove that validation is a good idea > > But is ok for me not accept this issue, just want to move discussion to a > more formal workflow I read that. What exactly are you proposing in detail?
- Set warning for "Serializable class without serialVersionUID" default to false
That does not make sense given http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/154 got withdrawn. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 479928 ***