Comment 1 Mateusz Matela 2018-02-14 13:37:42 EST

Could you be more specific?

Comment 2 Dani Megert 2018-02-15 08:31:29 EST

(In reply to Mateusz Matela from comment #1)
> Could you be more specific?

They are not sharp.

Comment 3 Mateusz Matela 2018-02-18 18:20:16 EST

You man scaled down? There are several scaled down images on this and other N&N pages. How else can you present something that exceeds the 520 pixels width limit?

Comment 4 Dani Megert 2018-02-19 09:18:57 EST

(In reply to Mateusz Matela from comment #3)
> You man scaled down? There are several scaled down images on this

Yes, filed bugs for those too.

Comment 5 Noopur Gupta 2018-03-07 01:59:19 EST

(In reply to Mateusz Matela from comment #3)
> You man scaled down? There are several scaled down images on this and other
> N&N pages. How else can you present something that exceeds the 520 pixels
> width limit?
You can try to remove the unnecessary parts from the screenshot (if any) or try to split the picture into multiple parts.

Comment 6 Mateusz Matela 2018-03-07 17:32:51 EST

(In reply to Noopur Gupta from comment #5)
> You can try to remove the unnecessary parts from the screenshot (if any) or
> try to split the picture into multiple parts.

But the whole purpose of the first screenshot is to give an overview of the new profile editor window. So IMO showing it whole is more important than having readable text. Making a comic strip with different parts of the window would look weird.

If having sharp images is suddenly so important, wouldn't it be better to change the 520 px limit? It's so 1990s... Even mobile devices today usually have more resolution than that.

Comment 7 Noopur Gupta 2018-05-08 06:14:50 EDT

(In reply to Mateusz Matela from comment #6)
> (In reply to Noopur Gupta from comment #5)
> > You can try to remove the unnecessary parts from the screenshot (if any) or
> > try to split the picture into multiple parts.
> 
> But the whole purpose of the first screenshot is to give an overview of the
> new profile editor window. So IMO showing it whole is more important than
> having readable text. Making a comic strip with different parts of the
> window would look weird.

The images in the news should also be clear and readable. Do you have any other suggestions on how to do that with the width restriction? 

> If having sharp images is suddenly so important, wouldn't it be better to
> change the 520 px limit? It's so 1990s... Even mobile devices today usually
> have more resolution than that.

There have been discussions about this on the mailing lists earlier as well.

Comment 8 Dani Megert 2018-05-10 10:01:10 EDT

One day left for M7!

Comment 9 Mateusz Matela 2018-05-11 04:05:40 EDT

(In reply to Noopur Gupta from comment #7)
> 
> The images in the news should also be clear and readable. Do you have any
> other suggestions on how to do that with the width restriction? 

No I don't. As a casual reader and occasional contributor of N&N notes, I feel the current state is the best compromise between conflicting requirements.
If you have a different perspective, you're free to do whatever you want with it.

Comment 10 Eclipse Genie 2018-05-15 05:35:32 EDT

New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/122644

Comment 11 Eclipse Genie 2018-05-15 05:38:09 EDT

Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/122644 was merged to [master].
Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/www.eclipse.org/eclipse/news.git/commit/?id=2027428e6fef6367d12265c7b5fa21553eec5f84

Comment 12 Noopur Gupta 2018-05-15 06:25:59 EDT

Updated two screenshots. Removed the preview from the first one as the preview section is already shown in the last screenshot.