Bug 526143 - Mismatch in errors
Summary: Mismatch in errors
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: MDHT
Classification: Modeling
Component: CDA (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 blocker
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Project Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-10-17 08:38 EDT by Vignesh Saseendran CLA
Modified: 2017-10-17 08:38 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
NT_Bad_DocCode_r11_v2 (174.89 KB, text/xml)
2017-10-17 08:38 EDT, Vignesh Saseendran CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Vignesh Saseendran CLA 2017-10-17 08:38:19 EDT 
Created attachment 271032 [details]
NT_Bad_DocCode_r11_v2

We are going through the Certification process for MU. Per Certification requirement, the EHR system must have the ability to validate a C-CDA document and display the results. There are certain negative scenarios that need to be validated with the CDA Validator. 

When validating certain negative scenario XML, we see that there is a difference in the number of errors displayed in CDA Validator and EDGE Testing Tool(ETT). In the ETT, it says the document has "1" Conformance error, whereas the CDA Validator in the application says "0". 

We have updated the MDHT and Non-MDHT library with the below version:
 <mdht.models.version>3.0.2.20170920</mdht.models.version>
<mdht.plugins.version>3.0.0.201709200502</mdht.plugins.version>, 
yet the results are same. 

Kindly help me understand what version of library should we update our system with to match with ETT. I have also attached the 1 XML file that is having the same issue, review the XML and provide suggestions on the expected results.

Thanks
Vignesh C S
Business Analyst.