Bug 507965 - [Tooling] Remove the transition effect and guard fields from properties view and use code snippet view instead
Summary: [Tooling] Remove the transition effect and guard fields from properties view ...
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Papyrus-rt
Classification: Modeling
Component: tool (show other bugs)
Version: 0.8.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: 0.9.0   Edit
Assignee: Young-Soo Roh CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 494288
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2016-11-22 10:16 EST by Peter Cigehn CLA
Modified: 2017-03-08 12:24 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Cigehn CLA 2016-11-22 10:16:06 EST 
In the work with improving the UML-RT tab in the properties view for a transition, the standard UML support for the effect and guard fields was introduced as a work-around. The editing support of the effect and guard code is not very user friendly and should eventually be made with the code snippet view as proposed in Bug 494288.

This bug tracks the removal (or possible improvements) of the current effect and guard fields when the code snippet view is in place.
Comment 1 Peter Cigehn CLA 2017-02-03 02:59:23 EST 
I suggest to re-plan this one for 1.0.0 since the related Bug 494288 is planned for 1.0.0. When the code snippet view is introduced, then these (superfluous) fields shall be removed.
Comment 2 Young-Soo Roh CLA 2017-03-08 11:15:44 EST 
Fixed as part of bug#494288
Comment 3 Peter Cigehn CLA 2017-03-08 11:19:31 EST 
Updating target milestone to indicate that this will be included in the 0.9.0 release.
Comment 4 Peter Cigehn CLA 2017-03-08 12:24:19 EST 
Verified to be fixed in the latest Papyrus-RT build. Now when the code snippet view is in place for editing the guard and effect code for a transition, the standard (and pretty cumbersome to use) guard and effect fields in the properties view have now been removed.
Comment 5 Peter Cigehn CLA 2017-03-08 12:24:35 EST 
Closing are verified fixed.