Community
Participate
Working Groups
Type: } catch ( The code assist that automatically comes up suggests only one item, and that is my own class that I am currently typing into. If automatic code assist is going to come up at all after catch, it might as well be useful and give me the list of exceptions.
Core code assist issue. The content assist window only pops up if there are proposals which are provided by the core.
Is the test case the entire compilation unit content ? If so, then I do not get the problem. Code assist is ignoring the noise before the completion location, therefore it will not treat make sense of the bogus source before. In general, for catch blocks, it will infer a type completion. Restraining to only exception types would require to intersect completions with a hierarchy of Throwable which we do not have cached anywhere. This is why we currently answer all types. I am wondering if the auto-completion story is such a good idea in the sense that it will expose all underlying misleading completions (like the hover-help for open on selection).
Good candidate for the relevance computation (for better sorting proposals).
Some of the smartness is released for M5, not all of it. This one in particular will not happen until M6.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13487 ***
Ignore my previous comment. it's an errror.
If the proposal is an exception (type name contain 'exception' or 'error') then proposal is more relevant. Fixed.
