Bug 44157 - [quick fix] Replace '=' with '==' in expression
Summary: [quick fix] Replace '=' with '==' in expression
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: JDT-UI-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 421043 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-03 16:57 EDT by Adam Kiezun CLA
Modified: 2013-11-06 11:24 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Adam Kiezun CLA 2003-10-03 16:57:04 EDT
3.0M3

i've gotten so used to pressing ctrl+1 whenever i see a red wiggly line that i
was surprised not to find a remedy for this:

void foo(int i){
  if (i = 6){//error here, but no quick fix
  }
}

i know it takes like 0.5s to type that myself but i *already have the quick fix
menu open* so the fix being there would save me keystrokes (and quickfix works
anywhere on a line - i don't have to go to exactly the location of '=')
Comment 1 Martin Aeschlimann CLA 2004-05-07 12:04:57 EDT
not for 3.0
Comment 2 Denis Roy CLA 2009-08-30 02:15:34 EDT
As of now 'LATER' and 'REMIND' resolutions are no longer supported.
Please reopen this bug if it is still valid for you.
Comment 3 Dani Megert CLA 2013-11-06 06:47:47 EST
.
Comment 4 Dani Megert CLA 2013-11-06 06:48:32 EST
*** Bug 421043 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 llewellyn falco CLA 2013-11-06 07:54:59 EST
(In reply to Dani Megert from comment #4)

Dani, 

I just want to make sure. This bug was closed, with a 'reopen if needed'. I opened a new bug, but it was assigned a duplicate.
But now this original bug is reopened. Is that correct?

thanks,
Llewellyn
Comment 6 Dani Megert CLA 2013-11-06 08:01:14 EST
(In reply to llewellyn falco from comment #5)
> (In reply to Dani Megert from comment #4)
> 
> Dani, 
> 
> I just want to make sure. This bug was closed, with a 'reopen if needed'. I
> opened a new bug, but it was assigned a duplicate.
> But now this original bug is reopened. Is that correct?

This bug here got closed by an automated process at some point, but it turns out to still be valid. Hence, I reopened it and marked yours as a duplicate.