Bug 42761 - IndexManager should be implemented in term of background job
Summary: IndexManager should be implemented in term of background job
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 59751
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.0 M9   Edit
Assignee: JDT-Core-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-09 05:08 EDT by Philipe Mulet CLA
Modified: 2004-06-24 05:53 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Philipe Mulet CLA 2003-09-09 05:08:00 EDT 
Build 3.0M3

Using the new platform support for background jobs, the index manager should be 
migrated to use this support.

Instead of directly feeding indexing small jobs to the platform job manager, a 
macro job (index manager) should be enqueued so as to encapsulate all indexing 
activity.
Comment 1 Jerome Lanneluc CLA 2004-03-04 09:51:03 EST 
Do we still want that? My understanding is that the platform jobs are not 
guarantied to run in the order they were added.
Comment 2 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-03-09 12:27:33 EST 
Not for 3.0. We would need to contribute a macro-job doing the indexing of our 
indexing subjobs.
Comment 3 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-03-10 07:17:20 EST 
Not for 3.0
Comment 4 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-06-24 05:52:06 EDT 
Reopen
Comment 5 Philipe Mulet CLA 2004-06-24 05:53:35 EDT 
Resolved by contributing a system job so as to report progress.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 59751 ***