Bug 415361 - [search]"Find references" does not find "implicit params" javadoc
Summary: [search]"Find references" does not find "implicit params" javadoc
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 4.3   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Vikas Chandra CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: stalebug
Keywords: helpwanted
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-08-19 13:20 EDT by Zorzella Mising name CLA
Modified: 2024-02-19 18:53 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
workaround fix (1.33 KB, patch)
2019-04-02 06:26 EDT, Vikas Chandra CLA
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Zorzella Mising name CLA 2013-08-19 13:20:32 EDT
In the code below, if you "Find references" of "foo", you find "baz" but not "bar".

public class ForJavadoc {

  private void foo() {}

  /**
   * @see #foo
   */
  private void bar() {}

  /**
   * @see #foo()
   */
  private void baz() {}  
}
Comment 1 Srikanth Sankaran CLA 2013-08-19 23:40:46 EDT
Per http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#@see,
the form without parentheses should be accepted with a warning.
Comment 2 Manoj N Palat CLA 2013-08-19 23:47:58 EDT
(In reply to comment #1)
> Per
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#@see,
> the form without parentheses should be accepted with a warning.

To refer bug 191322 and bug 51911 comment 12 as well
Comment 3 Eclipse Genie CLA 2019-03-06 19:13:08 EST
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 4 Zorzella Mising name CLA 2019-03-07 11:48:05 EST
This is still broken in Eclipse 4.9
Comment 5 Stephan Herrmann CLA 2019-03-07 11:59:47 EST
(In reply to "Z" Zorzella from comment #4)
> This is still broken in Eclipse 4.9

Thanks for re-testing.

We keep under "Version" the first version where the problem was observed.
Comment 6 Vikas Chandra CLA 2019-04-02 06:26:57 EDT
Created attachment 278119 [details]
workaround fix

Not suggesting this as a fix !
Comment 7 Eclipse Genie CLA 2022-02-28 13:55:09 EST
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 8 Eclipse Genie CLA 2024-02-19 18:53:35 EST
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.