Community
Participate
Working Groups
The code in this method is too limited wrt to the possible input types. It assumes that editInput is one of a set of types, or that it can be adapted to IFile. However, not all stores might be IFiles. It would be good, if one could register additional algorithms to get the URI from an editorInput. Maybe by adding some lines trying to adapt to URI?
(In reply to Andreas Graf from comment #0) > The code in this method is too limited wrt to the possible input types. It > assumes that editInput is one of a set of types, or that it can be adapted > to IFile. However, not all stores might be IFiles. It would be good, if one > could register additional algorithms to get the URI from an editorInput. > > Maybe by adding some lines trying to adapt to URI? Would you like to sketch what these lines should look like to get a clear picture of your idea?
Closed stale issue before migration