Bug 408838 - [release] modeling.emf.egf 1.1
Summary: [release] modeling.emf.egf 1.1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Proposals and Reviews (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Eclipse Management Organization CLA
QA Contact:
URL: http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Documentation
Depends on:
Blocks: 393682
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-05-23 12:23 EDT by Wayne Beaton CLA
Modified: 2013-07-11 15:24 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
wayne.beaton: pmc_approved+


Attachments
Approved IP Log (93.22 KB, text/html)
2013-06-05 09:00 EDT, Wayne Beaton CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-23 12:23:01 EDT
We'll use this bug to track the EGF 1.1 release for Kepler.

Note that per Bug 393682, the Modeling project has been restructured and mid-level "container" projects (e.g. modeling.emf, modeling.emft, etc.) have been marked for termination. This project will have to be moved into the top level project. In all likelihood, very little about the project will have to change. We need to enumerate and effect those changes before this review can be declared successful.

We will move modeling.emf.egf to modeling.emf. Does this make sense?

This should have the following impact:

* Project id changes
* Project info page URL changes
* Project IP Log generator URL changes

We should change the Bugzilla product from "EMF.EGF" to just "EGF". I recommend that you ask the webmaster to create a "dummy inbox" for the project. Using a dummy inbox makes it easier for the community to follow the project.

Project website, and downloads do not need to change.

Have I missed anything?
Comment 1 Benoit Langlois CLA 2013-05-24 05:00:18 EDT
Hello Wayne,

I think that instead of "We will move modeling.emf.egf to modeling.emf.", you mean "modeling.emf.egf to modeling.egf".
The concept of "dummy inbox" is not clear in my head but I'm going to contact the webmaster.

Benoit
Comment 2 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-24 10:47:54 EDT
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think that instead of "We will move modeling.emf.egf to modeling.emf.",
> you mean "modeling.emf.egf to modeling.egf".

Yup.

> The concept of "dummy inbox" is not clear in my head but I'm going to
> contact the webmaster.

I added some content to the Webmaster FAQ:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Webmaster_FAQ#Dummy_Inboxes
Comment 3 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-28 13:42:41 EDT
Benoit submitted the IP Log.
Comment 4 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-06-05 09:00:07 EDT
Created attachment 231986 [details]
Approved IP Log
Comment 5 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-06-06 15:49:13 EDT
PMC Approval: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/modeling-pmc/msg02842.html
Comment 6 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-06-17 12:08:46 EDT
I declare this review successful! Please continue with your release.

Please assemble a list of action items to complete the move of this project. There are a few projects that need to move, so let's wait until we have all/most of them ready to go before we copy the webmaster and ask him to effect the changes all at once.
Comment 7 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-07-11 15:24:36 EDT
(In reply to comment #6)
> Please assemble a list of action items to complete the move of this project.
> There are a few projects that need to move, so let's wait until we have all/most
> of them ready to go before we copy the webmaster and ask him to effect the
> changes all at once.

I've changed my mind. I'll leave it to the Modeling PMC's discretion to determine how to implement the moves defined by the Modeling Restructuring (Bug 393682). Since the release is complete, I'm marking this bug as FIXED.