Community
Participate
Working Groups
I'll use this bug to track the Kepler Release for GMF Runtime 1.7.0. IP Log has been submitted for review by the IP Team. Note that per Bug 393682, the Modeling project has been restructured and mid-level "container" projects (e.g. modeling.emf, modeling.emft, etc.) have been marked for termination. This project will have to be moved into the top level project. In all likelihood, very little about the project will have to change. We need to enumerate and effect those changes before this review can be declared successful. How does modeling.gmf-runtime grab you for a project id?
(In reply to comment #0) > How does modeling.gmf-runtime grab you for a project id? Works for me.
(In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > How does modeling.gmf-runtime grab you for a project id? > > Works for me. +1
Created attachment 231039 [details] Approved IP Log
PMC Approval: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/modeling-pmc/msg02851.html
I declare this review successful! Please continue with your release.
Sorry... reopening to address the move requirement. Please assemble a list of action items to complete the move of this project. There are a few projects that need to move, so let's wait until we have all/most of them ready to go before we copy the webmaster and ask him to effect the changes all at once.
Standalone website is now done: http://www.eclipse.org/gmf-runtime/
Anthony, Sorry for interrupting here, but can you point me to the place in the git where this site is served from? Trying to figure out where to put the new version of the gmf-tooling site. Thanks Regards Michael
(In reply to comment #8) > Sorry for interrupting here, but can you point me to the place in the git > where this site is served from? See Bug 408143
(In reply to comment #6) > Please assemble a list of action items to complete the move of this project. > There are a few projects that need to move, so let's wait until we have all/most > of them ready to go before we copy the webmaster and ask him to effect the > changes all at once. I've changed my mind. I'll leave it to the Modeling PMC's discretion to determine how to implement the moves defined by the Modeling Restructuring (Bug 393682). Since the release is complete, I'm marking this bug as FIXED.