Bug 3552 - TP125: sourcet folders should be project relative (1G83TSS)
Summary: TP125: sourcet folders should be project relative (1G83TSS)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 3471
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0   Edit
Hardware: All Windows NT
: P2 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Martin Aeschlimann CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-10-10 22:57 EDT by Erich Gamma CLA
Modified: 2001-11-12 12:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Erich Gamma CLA 2001-10-10 22:57:01 EDT
TM (25.01.2001 12:16:12)
	TM (25.01.2001 11:51:54)
	ITPJUI 71.50

	1) open a "create java project" wizard
	2) goto the "Source" tab on the build path settings page.
	3) create a new source folder.
	4) observe: the source folder path you have to enter is a path relative to the project, but 
		the path is rendered as workspace relative in the source folders list.
	5) observe: the bin folder is always workspace relative.

	On a related note: 

	1) enter some project name
	2) go to the source page
	3) add a new source folder
	4) press "back" to the project name page
	5) press next
	6) observe: the source folder is still there
	7) press "back" to the project name page
	8) change the name
	9) press next
	10) observe: the source folder is gone.

	I we would treat the source folders, etc. as project relative, we wouldn't have to lose the settings
	when the project name is changed.

EG (2/1/01 9:52:31 AM)
	there needs to be a workbench convention for how to present workbench relative path names.
Comment 1 Martin Aeschlimann CLA 2001-10-16 11:16:09 EDT
moved to 'active'
Comment 2 Erich Gamma CLA 2001-11-10 17:55:36 EST
we changed to remove the / when we show project names,
e.g. on the status line. This must be an oversight and we
should change this path to be relative as well.
Comment 3 Martin Aeschlimann CLA 2001-11-12 12:11:37 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3471 ***