Bug 351288 - [Zest] Graph Tooltips are not working
Summary: [Zest] Graph Tooltips are not working
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: RAP
Classification: RT
Component: Incubator (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 enhancement with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Austin Riddle CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-07-06 05:28 EDT by Arnaud MERGEY CLA
Modified: 2011-07-28 05:27 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Snippet allowing to reproduce the issue (14.58 KB, application/octet-stream)
2011-07-06 05:28 EDT, Arnaud MERGEY CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arnaud MERGEY CLA 2011-07-06 05:28:08 EDT
In HEAD

In Zest it seems that it is not possible to display tooltips on graph elements.

It can be tested with attached snippet.
-Launch snippet.zest application
-Select a connection between 2 nodes and keep the mouse on it.

expected: "Tooltip" should be displayed but nothing happened

The provided snippet is single sourced, so it can be launched in RCP. In RCP tooltips are displayed as expected
Comment 1 Arnaud MERGEY CLA 2011-07-06 05:28:51 EDT
Created attachment 199171 [details]
Snippet allowing to reproduce the issue
Comment 2 Austin Riddle CLA 2011-07-06 15:11:00 EDT
In general, RAP does allow for controls to set a string tooltip, but their display is handled on the client side. So it is theoretically possible to have a string tooltip for a Zest graph node. The fundamental issue with the Zest/GEF port is that RAP does not support mouse move or hover on the server.  The GEF port utilizes canvas objects and therefore does not currently have a custom client-side representation that supports the Zest API for setting an arbitrary figure to be a tooltip.  I can look into making sure the string tooltips work, but figure based tooltips are a bridge too far at this point.
Comment 3 Ralf Sternberg CLA 2011-07-28 05:27:00 EDT
As I understand it, this bug requests a feature that is currently not implemented in the GEF port.
Please note that the GEF port is a prototype, it's not meant to be feature complete.
Setting to enhancement.