Bug 343283 - NPEs when running jdt.compiler.tool.tests against Java 7
Summary: NPEs when running jdt.compiler.tool.tests against Java 7
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.7   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux-GTK
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Olivier Thomann CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: investigate
Depends on: 342936
Blocks: 342688
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-04-19 11:47 EDT by Dani Megert CLA
Modified: 2011-08-18 07:52 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dani Megert CLA 2011-04-19 11:47:27 EDT 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #342936 +++

We have made the tests more resilient but we should still investigate why we don't get the compiler in the test setup.

Not high prio.
Comment 1 Olivier Thomann CLA 2011-04-28 15:42:50 EDT 
Could it be relate to code coverage ? I guess it something goes wrong while loading the default compiler, then it might return null.
Kim, is it possible to run these tests again and see if there is anything interesting in the logs.
Comment 2 Kim Moir CLA 2011-04-28 16:50:11 EDT 
Sure, I can rerun them.  Olivier, do you have a preference for the vm to run them with - Oracle or IBM?
Comment 3 Dani Megert CLA 2011-04-29 01:53:03 EDT 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Could it be relate to code coverage ? I guess it something goes wrong while
> loading the default compiler, then it might return null.
> Kim, is it possible to run these tests again and see if there is anything
> interesting in the logs.

Didn't we already disable code coverage on the latest Oracle Java 7 run?(In reply to comment #2)


> Sure, I can rerun them.  Olivier, do you have a preference for the vm to run
> them with - Oracle or IBM?
Please use Oracle for now. Unfortunately the latest IBM results don't have the logs.
Comment 4 Kim Moir CLA 2011-04-29 11:06:09 EDT 
Yes, code coverage was disabled when I ran them.
Comment 5 Dani Megert CLA 2011-08-18 07:52:02 EDT 
I guess we can close this for now.