Comment 1 Philipe Mulet 2003-03-09 05:39:47 EST

What would you expect ? This is a bogus situation...

Comment 2 Olivier Thomann 2003-03-10 09:03:09 EST

Do you get a JavaModelException? I think this is perfectly normal according to
the specs.

Comment 3 Pascal Rapicault 2003-03-10 09:08:46 EST

I would expect it to return the default package.

Comment 4 Olivier Thomann 2003-03-10 09:10:39 EST

There is no reason to create a package declaration for the default package, 
because the default package means that you DON'T have a package declaration. 
The API states that you need to provide a valid package name and "" is not a 
valid package name.

Comment 5 Olivier Thomann 2003-03-10 13:17:57 EST

For me the problem comes from the getPackageDeclaration(String) method. This
method returns the default package declaration when called with an empty string.
getPackageDeclarations() returns an empty list in case the compilation unit is
in the default package.
getPackageDeclaration(String) should throw a JavaModelException in case it is
called with a name which is not a valid package name.

Comment 6 Olivier Thomann 2003-03-18 13:55:09 EST

This is not a bug. We follow the specs.
"" is not a valid package name and therefore should not be used by 
createPackageDeclaration(...).