Community
Participate
Working Groups
Build Identifier: The main problem with this dialog is that JAWS reads the first radio button as '1 of 1' so the user is unaware that there are 2 other options on the page. We need the button to be read as '1 of 3' so the user can change the selection Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start JAWS and then start Memory Analyzer 2. Open a heap dump 3. Listen to JAWS describe the getting started dialog
Created attachment 192255 [details] Proposed patch I have had to change the layout of the dialog to use a FormLayout so that JAWS can recognise the button's as being in a group. Have also overridden the accessible names of the radio buttons and labels so that the user gets the orect things read out
(In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 192255 [details] > Proposed patch > > I have had to change the layout of the dialog to use a FormLayout so that JAWS > can recognise the button's as being in a group. Have also overridden the > accessible names of the radio buttons and labels so that the user gets the > correct things read out I have also formatted the code to comply with the project standard
Thanks for the patch. I'm not sure if building text by taking a title and adding a full stop, then adding the description is safe for languages such as Japanese.
(In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the patch. > > I'm not sure if building text by taking a title and adding a full stop, then > adding the description is safe for languages such as Japanese. Putting these two items together does not change the meaning so this should not be a problem for translation.
Thanks for the patch! I did some testing and think the changes are fine. I'd like to submit the patch. To fulfill the process requirements, please could you confirm for the patch: 1.that you wrote 100% of the code 2.that you are authorized to contribute it 3.that is is submitted under the EPL.
Comment on attachment 192255 [details] Proposed patch Checked in with revision 1108. I adjusted the Copyright header in the file.
Closing the bug as the patch solves the problem.
I confirm that I wrote 100% of the code, that I am authorized to contribute it and that it is submitted under the EPL.
Bug 282032 lists a similar problem.