Bug 316403 - need regression for xdc.runtime dependencies (315822)
Summary: need regression for xdc.runtime dependencies (315822)
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: RTSC (ARCHIVED)
Classification: Technology
Component: Runtime (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Sasha Slijepcevic CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: test
Depends on: 315822
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-06-09 21:18 EDT by Dave Russo CLA
Modified: 2011-11-09 18:55 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dave Russo CLA 2010-06-09 21:18:40 EDT 
A simple test package containing executables all of which set rtsName to null can be "xdc released" and checked for xdc.runtime dependencies.  Such a test should be extended to include modules with @NoRuntime specified.
Comment 1 Sasha Slijepcevic CLA 2010-08-04 21:05:38 EDT 
The test 'ecl.ecl316403', added in xdctest-a26, builds two packages - one with a library containing only one NoRuntime module, and one with an executable setting rtsName to 'null'. Both packages are then released and their package/package.ext.xml file is checked for 'xdc.runtime'.

This test also verifies the fix for 319891. In the package with a NoRuntime module, the file package/package.cfg.dep contains 'xdc.runtime' references, but in the releases built with XDCtools in which 319891 is fixed, package.ext.xml does not contain a reference to 'xdc.runtime'.
Comment 2 Dave Russo CLA 2011-11-09 18:55:54 EST 
closing "ancient" resolved bugs