Community
Participate
Working Groups
We must add a readme entry for this new preference.
Shouldn't we have a new entry in the N&N instead of the readme?
There is no N&N post M7. John, should we prepare a N&N entry for the 3.6 N&N ?
(In reply to comment #2) > There is no N&N post M7. > John, should we prepare a N&N entry for the 3.6 N&N ? I sent a draft of the final JDT 3.6 N&N to Dani and Markus. You can always add an extra entry to that.
Created attachment 169973 [details] Proposed patch for the JDT N&N
(In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=169973) [details] > Proposed patch for the JDT N&N Released for 3.6RC3
Agree to put this into N&N instead of readme ==> adjusted summary.