Bug 313644 - javadoc for java.io package throwing exceptions
Summary: javadoc for java.io package throwing exceptions
Status: VERIFIED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows Vista
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.7 M5   Edit
Assignee: Ayushman Jain CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: needinfo
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-05-19 22:54 EDT by jakej2020 CLA
Modified: 2011-01-25 01:45 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jakej2020 CLA 2010-05-19 22:54:39 EDT 
Javadoc for java.io reporting:
eclipse.buildId=unknown
java.version=1.6.0_19
java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.
BootLoader constants: OS=win32, ARCH=x86, WS=win32, NL=en_US
Framework arguments:  -product org.eclipse.epp.package.java.product
Command-line arguments:  -os win32 -ws win32 -arch x86 -product org.eclipse.epp.package.java.product


Error
Fri Apr 16 10:28:51 PDT 2010
various errors accessing Javadoc for java.io classes incluidng:
Unknown javadoc format for File [in File.class [in java.io [in C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\lib\rt.jar]]]

and 

Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [Unknown javadoc format for ObjectOutputStream [in ObjectOutputStream.class [in java.io [in C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\lib\rt.jar]]]]
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.JavadocContents.getTypeDoc(JavadocContents.java:86)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.BinaryType.getAttachedJavadoc(BinaryType.java:996)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.javadoc.JavadocContentAccess2.getHTMLContent(JavadocContentAccess2.java:462)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.javadoc.JavadocContentAccess2.getHTMLContent(JavadocContentAccess2.java:442)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.ProposalInfo.extractJavadoc(ProposalInfo.java:96)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.ProposalInfo.computeInfo(ProposalInfo.java:76)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.ProposalInfo.getInfo(ProposalInfo.java:59)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.AbstractJavaCompletionProposal.getAdditionalProposalInfo(AbstractJavaCompletionProposal.java:548)
	at org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.AdditionalInfoController$3.run(AdditionalInfoController.java:106)
	at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:55)



-- Configuration Details --
Product: Eclipse 1.2.2.20100122-1337 (org.eclipse.epp.package.java.product)
Installed Features:
 org.eclipse.jdt 3.5.2.r352_v20100108-7r88FEwFI0WTuoBl0iaG0tyhfZH6
Comment 1 Dani Megert CLA 2010-05-20 02:21:14 EDT 
How did you specify the Javadoc? Are you behind a proxy? If so, you might see bug 215320.

>eclipse.buildId=unknown
Please provide the build ID (see Help > About Eclipse SDK). If it's also "unknown" in that dialog, then click on 'Installation Details' and give us the version of the org.eclipse.jdt.core plug-in.
Comment 2 Olivier Thomann CLA 2010-05-20 08:32:01 EDT 
Will investigate once requested information is provided.
Comment 3 jakej2020 CLA 2010-05-21 03:52:48 EDT 
Build id: 20100218-1602
Error occurs just using the javadoc tab on the console and selecting File in the editor.
Comment 4 Olivier Thomann CLA 2010-05-25 12:51:07 EDT 
Is the javadoc attached to your library standard javadoc ?
Comment 5 Dani Megert CLA 2010-05-26 02:45:40 EDT 
>Error occurs just using the javadoc tab on the console 
What tab?
Comment 6 Olivier Thomann CLA 2010-05-26 13:39:04 EDT 
I guess he is talking about the javadoc view. I still need to get an example of the javadoc format that is attached to your JRE.
Comment 7 Olivier Thomann CLA 2010-10-15 10:33:16 EDT 
Ayushman, this might be related to the javadoc work you are investigating.
Comment 8 Ayushman Jain CLA 2010-11-08 07:01:23 EST 
> Is the javadoc attached to your library standard javadoc ?

Any news? Please provide a testcase if possible.
Comment 9 Ayushman Jain CLA 2010-12-13 05:26:05 EST 
I intend to close this bug as WORKSFORME since nothing can be done without the required info.
Comment 10 Dani Megert CLA 2010-12-14 04:10:08 EST 
.
Comment 11 Srikanth Sankaran CLA 2011-01-25 01:45:59 EST 
Verified for 3.7 M5.

If information becomes available that would allow
us to make progress, please reopen.