Bug 295220 - Import rewrite related JDT/UI tests failing
Summary: Import rewrite related JDT/UI tests failing
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 194358
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.6 M6   Edit
Assignee: Jay Arthanareeswaran CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 194358 295638
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-11-16 05:10 EST by Jay Arthanareeswaran CLA
Modified: 2010-03-09 03:47 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jay Arthanareeswaran CLA 2009-11-16 05:10:00 EST 
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008052906 Firefox/3.0 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Build Identifier: N20091114-2000

Build N20091114-2000 has JDT/UI tests failing in the import rewrite area. 

This could be a regression from the fix to bug 194358.

I am investigating.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Dani Megert CLA 2009-11-16 05:20:43 EST 
Jay, when looking at the failing tests, please review whether those tests would actually better belong to JDT Core. Maybe we missed to push them down when we moved import rewrite from UI to Core.
Comment 2 Olivier Thomann CLA 2009-11-16 09:59:42 EST 
Jay,

I'll revert the previous fix. Please move to JDT/Core as many tests as possible if they are not strictly speaking UI tests.
Comment 3 Olivier Thomann CLA 2009-11-18 12:01:48 EST 
This should be addressed as part of the rework on bug 194358. Jay, please look at the test failures in JDT/UI and make sure we get the same test case inside our own tests.
Comment 4 Olivier Thomann CLA 2009-12-07 11:12:07 EST 
Waiting for JDT/UI to use the import context.
Moving to M5.
Comment 5 Olivier Thomann CLA 2010-01-22 10:33:55 EST 
Moving to M6 as bug 295638 won't be fixed in time for M5.
Comment 6 Olivier Thomann CLA 2010-02-10 12:32:08 EST 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 194358 ***
Comment 7 Satyam Kandula CLA 2010-03-09 03:47:37 EST 
Verified for 3.6M6 using build I20100305-1011