Bug 291433 - [1.5][compiler] Compile error (Cannot directly invoke the abstract method) in editor but source compiles outside the IDE. (I think it is also compiling in Eclipse but the editor still shows the error)
Summary: [1.5][compiler] Compile error (Cannot directly invoke the abstract method) in...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 284280
Alias: None
Product: JDT
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 3.5.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.6 M3   Edit
Assignee: Kent Johnson CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-05 20:14 EDT by Shahim Essaid CLA
Modified: 2009-10-08 15:40 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
The project showing the error. (434.75 KB, application/zip)
2009-10-05 20:15 EDT, Shahim Essaid CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Shahim Essaid CLA 2009-10-05 20:14:48 EDT 
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Build Identifier: 20090920-1017

Attached is the Java project that shows the error. It ocures on two lines and both errors are the same.  I tried this project in 3.6M2 and there was the same error.

The error is:
Cannot directly invoke the abstract method compareObjects(OWLQuantifiedRestriction<OWLObjectPropertyExpression,OWLDescription>, OWLQuantifiedRestriction<OWLObjectPropertyExpression,OWLDescription>) for the type OWLDescriptionComparator.AbstractOWLObjectComparator<OWLQuantifiedRestriction<OWLObjectPropertyExpression,OWLDescription>>	OWLDescriptionComparator.java	/Test/src/org/semanticweb/owl/util	line 385	Java Problem


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the attached Java project and the errors will be in the Problems view.
Comment 1 Shahim Essaid CLA 2009-10-05 20:15:56 EDT 
Created attachment 148842 [details]
The project showing the error.
Comment 2 Dani Megert CLA 2009-10-06 03:47:33 EDT 
Looks like a dup of bug 284280.
Comment 3 Kent Johnson CLA 2009-10-08 15:40:56 EDT 
Dani is correct - this is fixed by the same patch as bug 284280

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 284280 ***