Bug 280359 - [ajdoc] Missing fully qualified name for ITDs types in AJDoc
Summary: [ajdoc] Missing fully qualified name for ITDs types in AJDoc
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: AspectJ
Classification: Tools
Component: AJDoc (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 minor (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: aspectj inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-06-15 17:45 EDT by Andrew Eisenberg CLA
Modified: 2009-06-15 17:46 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
Minor AJDoc bug (25.15 KB, application/octet-stream)
2009-06-15 17:46 EDT, Andrew Eisenberg CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Eisenberg CLA 2009-06-15 17:45:10 EDT
This is something I found when doing stress testing of AJDT for 2.0.  I am going to attach a simple project where the generated types for ITDs are invalid.

In the inter-type field summary for AnAspect, there is this:
package .String>
package .String
package .Serializable

but it should be:
java.util.List<String>
java.lang.String
java.io.Serializable
Comment 1 Andrew Eisenberg CLA 2009-06-15 17:46:11 EDT
Created attachment 139218 [details]
Minor AJDoc bug