Comment 1 Gustavo de Paula 2009-03-12 12:01:53 EDT

Hi,

I Just updated mtj wiki with a brief initial proposal for the extension point.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Discussion/New_APIs/version_1.0/automatic_SDK_install

Comments are welcome,

I知 working on an initial prototype of it. Once I have something I create a patch and attach to bugzilla.

:)
gep

Comment 2 Gustavo de Paula 2009-05-14 15:42:59 EDT

not possible on current timeframe. maybe craig will be able to send a minimum set of changes.

Comment 3 Jon Dearden 2009-09-11 16:54:04 EDT

I will be making a contribution to this automatic installer extension point.

Jon Dearden

Comment 4 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:05:14 EST

Created attachment 153491 [details]
Patch for MTJ bug 264736

This patch supplies both a UI change to the Device Management Dialog(s) and changes to the internal Device Registry. It introduces a parallel mechanism for device management that is backwards compatible with the Device Registry. Please see the attached screen shots and class diagrams.

This submission is a fairly substantial change to the internal device handling and needs to be carefully reviewed. It may be wise to apply it to a new branch so people can get familiar with it before it goes into head.


Jon Dearden

Comment 5 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:06:50 EST

Created attachment 153492 [details]
New Device Management dialog

Comment 6 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:07:31 EST

Created attachment 153494 [details]
New Import Devices dialog

Comment 7 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:07:55 EST

Created attachment 153495 [details]
Class diagram for devices

Comment 8 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:08:20 EST

Created attachment 153496 [details]
Class diagram for the Device Registry

Comment 9 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:08:47 EST

Created attachment 153497 [details]
Class diagram for SDK classes

Comment 10 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:09:17 EST

Created attachment 153498 [details]
Class diagram for SDK provider classes

Comment 11 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 12:10:27 EST

I, Jon Dearden, have created the patch 153491 solely based on existing (EPL licensed) code in the MTJ project, and wrote 100% of the new code myself without using any other open source or proprietary source code as a basis for my work.

I am making my contribution available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License (EPL) to be included in the code base of the MTJ project.

Comment 12 Jon Dearden 2009-12-01 15:27:04 EST

Created attachment 153525 [details]
Sample SDK Providers

This attachment offers two sample SDK provider plug-ins that may be used to test the new provider extention point. These two minimal SDK providers offer a hand full of fake SDKs and devices. They can be used as a test clamp around the new APIs. I recommend they be added to the MTJ source so they can be extended by others.

Jon

Comment 13 Gustavo de Paula 2009-12-01 15:34:23 EST

hi jon,

thanks for this contribution. i will work on the patch review. if i have some question i will let you know

:)
gep

Comment 14 Gustavo de Paula 2009-12-03 10:10:13 EST

i'm working on this bug

Comment 15 Gustavo de Paula 2009-12-03 10:10:40 EST

Comment on attachment 153491 [details]
Patch for MTJ bug 264736

pathc is ok and committed to SVN

Comment 16 Gustavo de Paula 2009-12-03 10:11:29 EST

Comment on attachment 153525 [details]
Sample SDK Providers

reviewed and committed to SVN

Comment 17 Diego Madruga Sandin 2009-12-07 19:56:51 EST

This new feature was release in:

http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/mtj/downloads/drops/N-N20091207-200912071939/index.html

Comment 18 Gorkem Ercan 2010-06-24 13:02:43 EDT

Is there anything else left to be done for this one? I would like to close it.

Comment 19 Gustavo de Paula 2010-06-25 07:57:58 EDT

no. everything is done

(In reply to comment #18)
> Is there anything else left to be done for this one? I would like to close it.